Blog Post

How Will Facebook's New Workplace Platform Affect Work-Life Balance?

Today’s workplaces are in a constant state of evolution in terms of technology. I’m not breaking new ground by declaring that the Internet is changing everything, but it truly is. Facebook’s new Workplace platform sounds modern, efficient and maybe even a little fun for employees used to spending a lot of time on social media. However, I have one question about this and other work communication apps like Slack: how will they affect work-life balance? Work-life balance can be a buzz-phrase for human resources types, but there’s obviously a lot to be said for having time away from work. People today spend so much time on their various social media profiles that I can foresee potential issues with an app designed to be similar – or nearly identical to – to the ones most people use just for fun. Anna Wiener discusses in this article in The New Yorker: Workplace by Facebook, or A Party in the Office.

Photo: BIGSTOCK

The Unsayable Can Now Be Said Thanks to Trump

Thanks to Trump the unsayable can now be said. “Go back to where you came from,” is the phrase of the moment. Something I have been warning about for a while.  While Trump fiddles with the inflamed rhetoric of the extreme right and fires up his supporters’ hatred the rest of us are facing more prejudice than ever. While comparisons to Hitler may seem overblown, there are frightening echoes of what took place in pre-World War II Germany. Roger Cohen explores the language of hate in this New York Times piece, How Dictatorships are Born.

Credit: Damon Winter/The New York Times

OHIO: In The Twilight Zone

Last week I spoke at the Women in Leadership Conference at Ohio's Bowling Green University. The theme at this conference was Pathways to Promotion and Leadership. 

I agreed to speak at the event on the condition that it would not be censored and that it “may offend some sensitive ears and sponsors of the event.” I clearly indicated that if the organizers of the event were uncomfortable with this, then I was the wrong person to give this talk.

The reason for my caution is according to the World Economic Forum, Ohio ranks 40th out of the 51 States in gender diversity. Despite billions of dollars being spent across North America on diversity, harassment, sensitivity and performance management programs over the past few decades by organizations and corporations, the results have been beyond dismal. Given that fact, I did not, and will not, give a motivational speech full of human resource gobbledygook that only provides false hope.

During my speech, the event coordinator approached Patrick Mundt, the Executive Director of the Faas Foundation who was monitoring the power point slides, and demanded he hook me from the stage. She indicated that a few of the sponsors had walked out in disgust. 

However, Patrick and I observed an engaged audience, many taking notes and nodding in agreement. Afterwards, I received not one but two warm and enthusiastic ovations and many came up and thanked me for my frankness. One person said that those who came up to speak to me afterward were brave to do so because they were likely being watched by their co-workers or supervisors in attendance, and it could be a career-limiting move for them. This was particularly significant as Ohio is, an “at will” state where employees without a contract can be fired without cause – something that was repeated by a number of people at this event and two others I spoke with in Ohio. 

The event organizers did not come to me to express their displeasure—nor did they thank me for giving the speech. In response to a note we sent thanking the event coordinator for hosting us and allowing me to speak, we also asked her to confirm that sponsors were upset with what I said, which she did. 

Reflecting on this experience, it became obvious to us that Bowling Green University is more concerned about their financial sponsors than changing Ohio's dismal standing in gender diversity. Leaving the state, I felt I was leaving the Twilight Zone!

 

 Credit: Jessica Vailat/The Red List

What Businesses Could Learn About Competitiveness From Super Chickens

What does the traditional culture of competitiveness do to our workplaces? Business leader Margaret Heffernan discussed this on a recent episode of the TED Radio Hour using the superchicken study as an example. She discussed what a dog-eat-dog (or chicken-peck-chicken) environment does to productivity and emotional well-being within a company and how social cohesion is what makes for a truly winning team. I’ve long believed that a productive work environment comes from employees who know that their contributions are valued and are treated as respected members of the team. You can listen to her excellent talk here: Forget the Pecking Order at Work.

Credit: BIGSTOCK

Why Are Men Missing From the Job Market?

Many of those who have given up on employment are struggling with pain and disabilities according to a new working paper by a Princeton economist. What this does not show is the reasons men are missing. I assert that in large part it is because of ageism which starts at around 45—and the difficulty in finding alternative employment when they are let go because of their age. Can we really afford to overlook a significant portion of our skilled and experienced senior employees? I recommend this interesting article from the New York TimesMillions of Men are Missing From the Job Market.

Credit: Rachel Levit/The New York Times

Trump Bullying of Clinton Reaches New Low at Final Debate

One of the most important parts of creating psychologically healthy, safe and fair workplaces is learning how to identify and deal with bullies. Last night’s final presidential debate featured a man whose bullying tactics I’ve been writing about for months. In fact, Donald Trump inspired what might well be the shortest chapter in any work of non-fiction in North America—in my new book From Bully to Bull’s-Eye (RCJ Press; January 10, 2017) all I needed was one word in my chapter, “Definition of a Bully” to illustrate what I wanted to get across; that word is: Trump. I’m glad to see women refusing to be intimidated and embracing his latest bullying comment to Secretary Hillary Clinton and making it their own, but calling her “a nasty woman” is classic bullying behavior. 

Photo: KGO-TV

Accountability Counts: Holding Grant Recipients Responsible for How They Use Funds

What do you do when a significant donation to a charitable organization is not being used in accordance with prior agreement? Earlier this year the Faas Foundation was faced with that dilemma, which forced us to make an unprecedented decision. For the first time since the foundation was created in 2005 we lost confidence in a grantee and rescinded our donation of $1 million. This story in the Toronto Star outlines what happened when the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) didn’t implement its initiative to provide Canadian workplaces with training to identify risks of mental illness and support employees living with the diagnosis.  CAMH Loses $1 Million Donation Due to Issues of Accountability  The money was given in good faith to be part of a multi-pronged initiative between the Canadian CAMH and the American organization Mental Health America and the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence to explore ways to better understand and implement psychologically healthy, safe and fair workplaces. Sadly, CAMH’s elitist attitude, failure to implement and lack of transparency made us reconsider this donation. Philanthropist Questioned the Credibility of CAMH Before Rescinding Donation  Since this news has broken, another donor has considered removing his contribution to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) due to a lack of transparency and communication. The one error in this article is the assertion that the funds were to create a psychologically healthy workplace solely at CAMH. They were actually donated to fund research into evidence-based solutions for dealing with mental health issues in the workplace. It’s time for grant recipients to be accountable for the monies they receive.  CAMH Donor Says More Transparency Needed About Money

Photo: Brian B. Bettencourt/The Toronto Star 

What Do You Know About Your Workplace's Culture?

It’s important to take the time to assess your own workplace culture, and how you fit into it. As I’ve written before, and in my new book (out in January!), there are a few types of workplace cultures, and being both self-aware and aware of your workplace is important to finding a job that will be psychologically safe. And, to take it one step further, if you work in a position where you have the ability to enact change on your workplace’s culture, then do it! Too many professionals today pay lip service to workplace culture without actually trying to make positive changes where they can. Is Your Workplace Culture a Good Fit for You?

Credit: BIGSTOCK

Are Two-Thirds of Your Employees Ready to Walk Out?

While I’m not sure if I’d agree with every idea in this article, but the statistic that two-thirds of Canadian employees are ready to walk out the door of their offices should be startling for employers. While some businesses may think that turnover isn’t a problem, a revolving-door attitude towards employees can be extremely disruptive to a workplace culture. Creating disruptions in workplace culture can, at best, lead to the loss of difficult-to-replace senior employees; at worst, disruptions in the culture can lead to catastrophic organizational scandal. Managers need to show employees that they’re valued, not just on an intellectual level, but through substantive measures like salary, time off, and fair maternity/paternity leave. Find the details here: Two-Thirds of Your Employees are Ready to Move On.

Photo: BIGSTOCK

Cultural Transformation at the Royal Canadian Mounted Police

The sexual harassment issues with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have been well documented. However, in the face of the settlement they’ve made to close the class-action lawsuit against them, I wonder how much the RCMP will truly transform its culture to correct the faults that led to this situation in the first place. As I’ve written in my new book (out in January!), sexual harassment in the workplace is often the result of power-dynamic bullying and can often result in retaliation against the employee being harassed. Complete cultural change is needed to root out a harassing culture as extensive as the one at the RCMP – as over 500 current and former employees were part of the sexual harassment lawsuit. While a formal apology to the victims is a good first step, we have yet to see the substantive details for the organizational makeover needed at the RCMP. Read more at The Globe and Mail.

Image: RCMP commissioner Bob Paulson, left, answers a question during a news conference, as plaintiffs Janet Merlo, centr, and Linda Davidson look on in Ottawa on Thursday, Oct. 6, 2016.
Credit: Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS via Globe & Mail.