KPMG

Those Who Rely on Whistleblower Hotlines are Fools

Reports about the effectiveness of harassment hotlines are leaving me cold. In a recent Letter to the Editor of the New York Times, an attorney who formerly worked with the Labor Department’s Whistleblower Advisory Committee stated that hotline reporting went up 8 percent in 2016 and the average length of resolution dropped from 46 to 42 days. While I have the deepest respect for this individual and the work he does, he’s sadly misinformed.

I have also worked with a number of organizations on ethical issues and have done a fair amount of research in the field, which have led to two books on workplace dynamics—the most recent one being From Bully to Bull’s-Eye: Move Your Organization Out of the Line of Fire. My research has shown that most employees do not trust hotlines and other mechanisms to report workplace wrongdoing. There’s a good reason for this. Take the example of Michael J. Lutz who reported an impropriety he spotted in his work as an accounting specialist at the Radian Group. The company scheduled an investigation and concluded that he was wrong and everything was proper. Frustrated, Lutz reached out to the internal compliance hotline—and one of his superiors found out and retaliated and started to force him out of the company. That’s when he contacted the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is supposed to be the whistleblower’s advocate. In spite of having solid evidence of the retaliation, nothing happened.

Ironically, one of his tasks was to make sure that internal accounting controls were in proper compliance to avoid the strict penalties that resulted from the Enron-era legislation. When he was ousted, Radian hired an outside accounting firm to prove that they were in compliance. The firm? KPMG—the Big Four accounting firm whose improprieties I recently wrote about.

Clearly, business leaders aren’t hearing what employees have to tell them on every level. In a study conducted by Mental Health America sponsored by the Faas Foundation, an astounding 69 percent of more than 17,000 people surveyed admitted to speaking poorly about their organization to others. And yet, as in the case of Bill O’Reilly, leaders continue to insist that no one had a problem because there were no complaints to the whistleblower hotline.

Boards of Directors and senior executive often tout their policies, programs and HR departments as proof that they have a value-based, inclusive, safe and fair workplace culture that includes freedom of expression. My research says otherwise. Top management still isn’t listening, making all of their mechanisms for reporting misbehavior nothing more than legal shields. Even more disturbing, my research shows they don’t want to hear what they need to hear.

Illustration credit: Dilbert by Scott Adams

Why Auditors Need to be Audited

It is deeply disturbing when those we rely upon to be watchdogs for the rest of us succumb to lying and corruption. It’s even worse when we need them to police our finances—something that too often seems arcane and impenetrable by the average person and requires the expertise only a trained professional can provide.

Wednesday,  the New York Times reported that accounting giant KPMG had fired six employees, including its head of audit practice in the U.S., for getting tipped off about audit inspections. This inappropriate warning gave the accountants time to polish the portion that they learned would be inspected until it was free of errors. According to an editorial in the New York Times, KPMG had failed at earlier inspections. Its 2014 deficiency rate was 54 percent and its 2015 rate was 38 percent. Perhaps the firm had reason to be afraid.  

The organization seems to have handled things properly. KPMG had been tipped off by a whistleblower and had engaged an outside law firm to investigate, then took firm and appropriate action—a series of events that I commend. However, good practices when dealing with a whistleblower doesn’t get KPMG off the hook.

The company has long been under scrutiny for giving the scandal-ridden Wells Fargo and the deeply troubled world governing body for soccer, FIFA, clean bills of health. Whenever I see a company’s employees act out in egregious ways, such as I described yesterday about United, or in my previous coverage of Wells Fargo, I have to wonder what is going on at the top and how bad things are for employees. I can’t state too strongly that people who are employed in psychologically healthy, safe and fair workplaces aren’t given to appalling behavior.

When the head of audits for the entire country is part of this conspiracy, I also have to wonder if he went rogue or if he was just passing on the unethical behaviors of his superiors—or of the industry in general. There have been warnings. Last year U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) sent a powerful letter to KPMG bluntly calling into question the quality of their audits of Wells Fargo. If our auditors aren’t minding the store, what are they up to?

In this disinformation era, we need solid accounting—both figurative and literal—to keep us on track. Numbers are in too many cases that only metric we have to measure performance in business. Auditors are supposed to be on the lookout for errors, not facilitating mendacity. It’s true at any time, but particularly now during the Trump administration that auditors need to be audited. Given the role they play in our capitalist system, not doing so could have dire consequences.

Photo credit: Reuters/Mike Blake